Comparison between the Effect of Transforaminal Steroid Injection and Transforaminal Steroid Injection Combined with Spinal Decompressor on Lumbar Disc Herniation

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term clinical effect of a new spinal decompression device (DRX-3000) combined with transforaminal steroid injection (TFI) in comparison with TFI only in patients with lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD) METHOD: Fourty-one patients diagnosed as lumbar intervertebral disc herniation were recruited and divided into two therapeutic groups. Eighteen patients were treated with DRX-3000 combined with TFI. Twenty-three patients were treated with only TFI. The visual analogue scale (VAS), straight leg rasing test (SLR), radiating pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), sitting tolerance, standing tolerance and sleeping tolerance were measured before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: VAS, radiating pain, sitting tolerance and ODI were significantly improved after treatment in all patients (p<0.05). SLR and sleeping tolerance were significantly improved in combined treatment group and standing tolerance were significantly improved in TFI group after treatment (p<0.05). After treatment, degree of VAS decrease was larger in combined treatment group than TFI group(p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Spinal decompression with TFI was more effective than only TFI in patients with lumbar HIVD in a short period.

Ultrasonog raphic Findings of Esophageal Varices

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the clinical usefulness of ultrasonography for detecting esophageal varices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 cases of esophaged varix, the authors analysed the transabdominal ultrasono-graphicfindings of the esophagogastric junction and compared mural thickness, the anteroposterior diameter of theesophagus, and the echogenic nature of the esophageal mucosal layer with those of 78 normal patients. RESULTS:The anterior and posterior mural thickeness of normal esophagus was 2.2 +/-0.7 and 2.4 +/-0.8mm re-spectively, butfor variceal esophagus, the corresponding readings were 5.9 +/-1.3 and 5.2 +/-1.3mm respective-ly. Theanteroposterior diameter of normal esophagus was 7.9 +/-2.1mm and that of variceal esophagus was 1 4 . 0 +/-1.8mm.There was a stastically significant difference (p<0.01) in mural thickness and anteroposterior diameter of theesophagus between a normal and variceal patient with regard to change of echogenic nature at the esphagogastricjunction. Normal esophageal mucosa showed a thin and uniform echogenic line, but for variceal mucosa, theechogenic pattern was irregular, tortuous and thick. CONCLUSION: The athors believe that transabdominal US ishelpful for detecting esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis and UGI bleeding. Important clinicallyuseful sonographic findings in diagnosing e-sophageal varix are as follows: 1) mural thickness more than 6mm; 2)anteroposterior diameter of the esopha-gus of more than 15mm; 3) irregular, tortuous and thickened echogenicmucosa.